Baha'i News -- Is every faith defensible?
Is every faith defensible?
By DAVID YOUNT
Scripps Howard News Service
May 27, 2002
As a young prince Henry VIII wrote a brilliant defense of the Catholic doctrine of the real presence of Christ in the
Eucharist. For the king's efforts the pope awarded him the title "Defender of the Faith." When, years later, Henry broke
with Rome and proclaimed himself the head of the church in England, the monarch kept the title and passed it along to his
Prince Charles, aware that on any given Sabbath fewer than a million of his future subjects worship in his nation's
established Anglican faith, has proposed on his accession to the throne to make himself the defender of all faiths.
It is a bad idea. How can one simultaneously defend all faiths when so many of them conflict with one another? It is one
thing to hold that religion is a good thing, but quite another to affirm that all faiths are equally good. If anything jumps
out of today's newspaper headlines, it is that the world's conflicts are so often justified on the basis of religious
differences. Can the future king equally defend the faith of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland when their
adherents are at each other's throats?
The prince recently held a summit for Britain's religious leaders and launched a movement called Respect. He surrounded
himself with the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, the Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Britain's chief rabbi
and representatives of Islam, the Sikhs, Bahai, Hindus, Buddhists and Jains.
Among the schemes proposed by the prince are opening Muslim schools to other religions, providing sanctuary for victims of
sectarian violence in Northern Ireland and promoting joint Christian-Muslim aid to the Palestinians.
While religious tolerance is a worthy objective, it is too often based on a sense that religious convictions are benign,
cozy feelings that don't make demands on believers. Interfaith understanding is a worthy enterprise, but only so long as we
understand that creedal differences have consequences.
For example, as Prince Charles was calling for Respect, the Saudi ambassador to Britain was publishing a tribute to
Palestinian suicide bombers who die (in his words) "to honor God's word." Of the first woman suicide bomber, the ambassador
announced that the "doors to heaven are opened for her."
It takes a lot of faith to blow oneself to bits, but is that a faith the prince ought to defend? And can we respect
religious laws that permit the exploitation of women and call for flogging, amputation and execution for adultery? In
Nigeria recently, a woman was sentenced under Islamic law to be buried up to her neck in sand and stoned to death.
Interfaith cooperation and collaboration are common in the United States, where we respect the separation of church and
state. But we wisely refrain from expecting our government to defend faith. Government's proper function is to defend
(David Yount's new book is "What Are We to Do? Living the Sermon on the Mount" (Sheed & Ward). He answers
readers at P.O. Box 2758, Woodbridge, VA 22193 and vy e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.)
©Copyright 2002, Scripps Howard News Service
Page last updated/revised 020527
Return to the Bahá'í Association's Main Web Page